Kearifan Lokal Gapoktanhut Sabrang Mandiri dalam Menghadapi Konflik Sebagai Penerima Akses Kelola Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Desa Sabrang Ambulu Jember
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v1i2.116Keywords:
Konflik, Gapoktanhut, Perhutanan SosialAbstract
Perhutanan sosial ialah program yang saat ini mejadi salah satu fokus utama Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) Republik Indonesia. Perhutanan sosial sendiri memiliki tujuan yaitu untuk mensejahterakan masyarakat sekitar hutan. Program ini adalah penjabaran dari “Nawacita” yang diusung oleh kabinet kerja presiden Jokowi yang memiliki tiga pilar dalam pelaksanaannya, yaitu lahan, kesempatan berusaha, dan sumberdaya manusia. Tujuan penelitian ini Menggambarkan tanggapan masyarakat tentang adanya Kelompok Perhutanan Sosial Gapoktanhut Sabrang Mandiri di Desa Sabrang Kecamatan Ambulu Kabupaten Jember. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data secara observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan pada dasarnya pemenuhan minimum sebelum adanya progam dari Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan sangat berbeda jauh dengan sesudah adanya program dari kementerian lingkungan hidup dan kehutanan karena pemenuhan minimum saat ini sangat tercukupi. Disisi lain penolakan yang terjadi di Hutan Sabrang adalah petani merasa kurang aman dan takut kepada para oknum perhutani akan tetapi semenjak ada Kelompok Sosial Gapoktanhut dari program Kementerian dan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan tidak ada yang berani berkuasa di wilayah hutan sabrang.
References
Ardiansyah, V., Gianawati, N. D., Ilmu, J., Sosial, K., Jember, F. U., & Kalimantan, J. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Perum Perhutani di Kecamatan Kalipuro, Kabupaten Banyuwangi (Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at Perhutani in District of Kalipuro, Banyuwangi Regency). 2(April), 39–44.
Bong, I. W. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184
Erbaugh, J. (2019). Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
Fisher, M. R. (2018). Assessing the New Social Forestry Project in Indonesia: Recognition, Livelihood and Conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
Fisher, M. R. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
Gunawan, J. (2023). Problematika Pengelolaan Hutan Adat Melalui Perhutanan Sosial Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Lhk No. 9 Tahun 2021. 9(2), 1382–1391. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v9i1.5101/http
Hadi, S., & Michael, T. (2021). Implikasi Hukum Resentralisasi Kewenangan Penyelenggaraan Urusan Konkuren terhadap Keberlakuan Produk Hukum Daerah. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 5(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.489
Karasmanaki, E. (2021). Impacts of social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic on the daily life of forestry students. Children and Youth Services Review, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105781
Lo, K. (2021). Authoritarian environmentalism, just transition, and the tension between environmental protection and social justice in China’s forestry reform. Forest Policy and Economics, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102574
Ludvig, A. (2018). Social innovation in the Welsh Woodlands: Community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement. Forest Policy and Economics, 95, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.004
Maier, C. (2018). Navigating social forestry – A street-level perspective on National Forest management in the US Pacific Northwest. Land Use Policy, 70, 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.031
Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi Dan Aplikasi, 2(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v2i1.2616
No.41, U.-U. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kehutanan.
Nurfatriani, F. (2019). Efektivitas Kebijakan Alokasi Lahan 12,7 Juta Ha Untuk Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.16.1
Octavia, D. (2022). Mainstreaming Smart Agroforestry for Social Forestry Implementation to Support Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: A Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159313
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No.6/2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan, Skema Pemanfaatan Hutan. (2007).
Price, C. (2018). Declining discount rate and the social cost of carbon: Forestry consequences. Journal of Forest Economics, 31, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2017.05.003
Rahayu, S. (2020). Bureaucratizing non-government organizations as governmental forest extension services in social forestry policy in Indonesia. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 29(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585
Rahman. (2021). Pendampingan Program Perhutanan Sosial Masyarakat Desa Hutan Burno Kabupaten Lumajang Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia 2030. Islamic Management, 3(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.18326/imej.v3i1.115-132
Rakatama, A. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052
Ravazzoli, E. (2021). Can social innovation make a change in european and mediterranean marginalized areas? Social innovation impact assessment in agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and rural development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041823
Rogelja, T. (2018). Implications of policy framework conditions for the development of forestry-based social innovation initiatives in Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics, 95, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.011
Sahide, M. A. K. (2020a). Prophets and profits in Indonesia’s social forestry partnership schemes: Introducing a sequential power analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102160
Sahide, M. A. K. (2020b). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Scott, J. C. (1981). Moral Ekonomi Petani.
Tajuddin, T. (2019). Bridging social forestry and forest management units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from sulawesi. Forest and Society, 3(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6049
Tiezzi, E., Marchettini, N., & Rosini, M. (2003). Extending the environmental wisdom beyond the local scenario: Eco-clynamic analysis and the learning community. Advances in Ecological Sciences, 18, 349–356.
van Noordwijk, M. (2020). Prophets, Profits, Prove It: Social Forestry under Pressure. One Earth, 2(5), 394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.008
Wong, G. Y. (2020). Social forestry in Southeast Asia: Evolving interests, discourses and the many notions of equity. Geoforum, 117, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.010
Wulandari, C. (2018). The Importance of Social Learning for the Development of Community Based Forest Management in Indonesia: The Case of Community Forestry in Lampung Province. Small-Scale Forestry, 17(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9392-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Wahyu Yudistiro, Itok Wicaksono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
