Digital Authoritarianism and Uyghur Identity Erasure as a Global Inflection Point

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v2i4.402

Keywords:

Digital Authoritarianism, Cultural Genocide, Uyghur Identity Erasure, Global Human Rights Crisis, AI-Driven Repression

Abstract

In the shadow of global silence, the Uyghur crisis in Xinjiang emerges not merely as a regional atrocity, but as a harrowing blueprint for 21st-century digital authoritarianism. This paper confronts China’s systematic campaign of Uyghur identity erasure—through mass internment, linguistic imperialism, forced labor, and AI-powered surveillance—and positions it as a defining inflection point for the global human rights order. Drawing from Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony, Phillipson’s linguistic imperialism, and Wallerstein’s world-systems theory, the study constructs a powerful interdisciplinary analysis that connects cultural domination with economic coercion and digital repression. Through comparative historical parallels and contemporary legal frameworks, the paper argues that China’s actions constitute crimes against humanity and cultural genocide. Yet this is more than a diagnosis—it is a call to action. The study calls on the world community to move beyond rhetoric and toward coordinated justice by laying out a bold, multi-pronged opposition strategy that includes legal responsibility, economic sanctions, educational resilience, media activism, and cybersecurity. In doing so, it reframes Xinjiang not as China’s internal matter, but as the world’s moral reckoning. The survival of Uyghur identity, and the credibility of human rights in the digital age, depend on our collective will to confront this dystopian template of repression—and dismantle it.

References

Amnesty International. (2021, June 10). China: Draconian repression of Muslims in Xinjiang amounts to crimes against humanity. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/06/china-draconian-repression-of-muslims-in-xinjiang-amounts-to-crimes-against-humanity-2/

Amnesty International. (2022, May 28). China: UN visit falls short of addressing crimes against humanity in Xinjiang. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/05/un-xinjiang-china-visit/

Associated Press. (2024, June 18). Religious and cultural mentions removed from names of China’s Xinjiang villages, rights groups say. AP News. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/da3152596943e4d5ff9a5b232582782e

Ayup, A., Tékin, S., & Sidick, E. (2022). Linguistic, Cultural, and Ethnic Genocide of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, China. The Handbook of Linguistic Human Rights, 341-355.

Baker-Beall, C., & Clark, R. (2021). A “Post-Copenhagen” Analysis of China’s Securitization of the Uyghur: A Counterproductive Securitization?. Democracy and Security, 17(4), 427-454.

Baranovitch, N. (2022). The “Bilingual Education” Policy in Xinjiang Revisited: New Evidence of Open Resistance and Active Support among the Uyghur Elite. Modern China, 48(1), 134-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700420969135

Bassiouni, M. C. (Ed.). (2002). Post-conflict justice (p. 91). Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

Borak, M. (2022, November 2). The strange death of the Uyghur internet. WIRED. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/uyghur-internet-erased-china/

Brophy, D. (2016). Uyghur nation: Reform and revolution on the Russia-China frontier. Harvard University Press.

Byler, D. (2021). In the Camps: China’s High-Tech Penal Colony. Columbia Global Reports. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2dzzqqm

Byler, D. (2022). Terror Capitalism: Uyghur Dispossession and Masculinity in a Chinese City. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv21zp29g

Clarke, M. (2010). The Xinjiang conflict: Uyghur identity, language policy, and political discourse. East-West Center. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep06543.1.pdf

Clarke, M. (2018). The belt and road initiative: Exploring Beijing’s motivations and challenges for its new silk road. Strategic Analysis, 42(2), 84-102.

Congressional-Executive Commission on China. (2022). Annual report 2021. U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.congress.gov/117/cprt/JPRT44458/CPRT-117JPRT44458.pdf

Dwyer, A. M. (2005). The Xinjiang conflict: Uyghur identity, language policy, and political discourse. East-West Center. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/xinjiang-conflict-uyghur-identity-language-policy-and-political-discourse

Economy, E. C. (2018). The third revolution: Xi Jinping and the new Chinese state. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.sa/books/about/The_Third_Revolution.html?id=3hBQDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Facing History and Ourselves. (2016). Raphael Lemkin and the Genocide Convention. https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/raphael-lemkin-genocide-convention

Feldstein, S. (2021). Digital repression: How technology strengthens autocracies. Journal of Democracy, 32(2), 25–39. Retrieved from https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/digital-repression-how-technology-strengthens-autocracies/

Freedom House. (2018). Freedom on the Net 2018: The rise of digital authoritarianism. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/rise-digital-authoritarianism

Gramsci, A. (2020). Selections from the prison notebooks. In The applied theatre reader (pp. 141-142). Routledge.

Harris, R. (2020). Soundscapes of Uyghur Islam. Indiana University Press.

Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford University Press.

Human Rights Watch. (2024, June 18). China: Hundreds of Uyghur village names change. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/06/18/china-hundreds-uyghur-village-names-change

Idris, A. (2025, January 24). How China’s boarding schools in Xinjiang (East Turkistan) are erasing a people’s identity: A Uyghur view. Center for Uyghur Studies. Retrieved from https://uyghurstudy.org/how-chinas-boarding-schools-in-xinjiang-east-turkistan-are-erasing-a-peoples-identity-a-uyghur-view/

International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/publications/core-legal-texts/rome-statute-international-criminal-court

Jardine, B., Lemon, E., & Hall, N. (2021). No space left to run: China’s transnational repression of Uyghurs. Uyghur Human Rights Project and Oxus Society for Central Asian Affairs. https://uhrp.org/report/no-space-left-to-run-chinas-transnational-repression-of-uyghurs/

Kanat, K. B. (2016). The securitization of the Uyghur question and its challenges. Insight Turkey, 18(1), 191-219. https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/the-securitization-of-the-uyghur-question-and-its-challenges

Leibold, J. (2019). Surveillance in China’s Xinjiang Region: Ethnic Sorting, Coercion, and Inducement. Journal of Contemporary China, 29(121), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1621529

Maizland, L. (2022, September 22). China’s repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights

McGranahan, C. (2010). Arrested histories: Tibet, the CIA, and memories of a forgotten war. Duke University Press. https://archive.org/details/arrestedhistorie0000mcgr

Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

Mozur, P. (2019, April 14). One month, 500,000 face scans: How China is using A.I. to profile a minority. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2023, September 26). China: Xinjiang’s forced separations and language policies for Uyghur children carry risk of forced assimilation, say UN experts. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/09/china-xinjiangs-forced-separations-and-language-policies-uyghur-children

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Polyakova, A., & Meserole, C. (2019, August). Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models (Policy Brief). Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/exporting-digital-authoritarianism/

Shelestyuk, E. V. (2021). Soviet Language Policy and Education in the Post-WWII Period. Социолингвистика, (4 (8)), 60-85.

Skutnabb-Kangas, T., Phillipson, R., & Wiley, J. (Eds.). (2023). The handbook of linguistic human rights. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Canada's residential schools: The final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. McGill-Queen's University Press. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.807830/publication.html

U.S. Congress. (2021). Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, H.R. 1155, 117th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1155

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention

United Nations. (2022, August 31). China responsible for ‘serious human rights violations’ in Xinjiang province: UN human rights report. UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/08/1125932

United Nations. (2023, September 26). Rights experts warn against forced separation of Uyghur children in China. UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/09/1141502

Wallerstein, I. (2020). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.

Yayboke, E., & Brannen, S. (2020, October 15). Promote and build: A strategic approach to digital authoritarianism. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/promote-and-build-strategic-approach-digital-authoritarianism

Zenz, A. (2019). Beyond the camps: Beijing’s long-term scheme of coercive labor, poverty alleviation and social control in Xinjiang. Journal of Political Risk, 7(12), 1-23.

Zenz, A. (2019, July 4). Break their roots: Evidence for China’s parent–child separation campaign in Xinjiang. Journal of Political Risk. Retrieved from https://www.jpolrisk.com/break-their-roots/

Downloads

Published

2025-04-27

How to Cite

Maspul, K. A., & Sopyan, I. (2025). Digital Authoritarianism and Uyghur Identity Erasure as a Global Inflection Point. Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v2i4.402

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.