Comparison of Supreme Court and Constitutional Court Decisions Based on Legal Standing in Open Legal Policy Pilkada 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/pssh.v2i3.306Keywords:
Comparison; Constitutional Court; Decision; Pilkada; Supreme CourtAbstract
This journal abstract focuses on a comparative analysis between the decisions of the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK) in the context of legal standing in the 2024 Pilkada open legal policy. This research aims to identify differences in the interpretation and application of the law by the two institutions regarding the legal standing of the applicant. The research method used is a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative approach is used to collect numerical data on the number and characteristics of cases, while the qualitative approach is applied to analyse the legal context and arguments used by the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court in deciding cases. The results show that the Supreme Court has a tendency to tighten legal access by focusing on procedural aspects, while the Constitutional Court provides wider space for public participation in assessing regulatory justice. This difference in approach results in potential conflicts that can affect the stability of Pilkada regulations. This research is expected to provide a new perspective for policymakers in formulating clearer and more consistent regulations, while increasing the transparency of decision-making in the judiciary.
References
Adryamarthanio, Verelladevanka, and Tri Indirawati. 2023. “4 Sistem Demokrasi Yang Pernah Diterapkan Di Indonesia.” Kompas.com.
Alfret Ananias, Nurianto Rahmat Soepadmo, Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada. 2024. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora 1(3): 232–45.
Amran Anshary Kelilauw, Zuhad Aji Firmanto. 2024. “Analisis Legal Standing Dan Konsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Materiil UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi Kasus Putusan No.90/PUU-XXI/2023.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 3(2): 97–107. https://dinastirev.org/JIHHP/article/view/1856/1092.
Bawaslu. 2023. Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu 2024 Pemilu Dan Pemilihan Serentak. ed. Tim Editor Bawaslu RI. Jakarta Pusat: Bawaslu.
Dedi, Agus. 2021. “Implementasi Prinsip- Prinsip Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal moderat 7(1): 1–9. https://ojs.unigal.ac.id/index.php/modrat/article/view/2392/1832.
Fayza Ayu Wulandari, Yufi Wiyos Rini Masykuroh, Ahmad Fauzi Furqon. 2024. “Tinjauan Fiqh Siyasah Terhadap Penolakan Judicial Review Pasal 222 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora 1(3): 179–94.
Hartono, Hasim. 2024. “Urgensi Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Tahun 2024.” Jurnal Intek dan Cendikiawan Nusantara 1(4): 5374–83. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn/article/view/855/967.
Henny Andriani. 2024. “Perkembangan Kedudukan Hukum Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 4(3): 489–501.
Ibrahim, Syaibani Ihza. 2024. “Legal Standing of the Applicant in Constitutional Court Decision [ Legal Standing Pemohon Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Khuluqiyya 06(2): 77–90.
Kennedy, Alexander, William Hartato Surya, Syilfia Regita Mustika, and Fransiscus Wartoyo Xaverius. 2024. “Sumber-Sumber Hukum Adminitrasi Negara Dalam Kerangka Good Governance Di Indonesia.” iuris studia 5(September): 558–69.
Muh Afit Khomsani, M.Adnan Maghribbi, Denny Siallagan, Muhammad Risyad Fahlefi. 2024. Strategi Pemantauan Pilkada Tahun 2024. ed. Erick Sambuari Lie. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.
Rahmani, Nadia Putri. 2024. “MA Kabulkan Uji Materiil Soal Batas Minimal Usia Calon Kepala Daerah.” Kantor Berita Indonesia.
Rishan, Idul. 2024. Teori & Hukum Konstitusi. ed. Ahmad Fa’iq Ismail. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.
Rohmah, Elva Imeldatur, and Zainatul Ilmiyah. 2024. “Dinamika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Usia Calon Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden.” PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum 8(1): 100–131.
Sari, Amelia Rahima. 2024. “Pakar Berberkan Potensi Masalah Di Pilkada 2024.” Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/pakar-berberkan-potensi-masalah-di-pilkada-2024-60539 (February 11, 2024).
Sarira, Beatrix Datu, and Fatma Ulfatun Najicha. 2022. “Adanya Seruan Masa Jabatan Presiden Tiga Periode Menunjukkan Kemunduran Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” De Cive: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2(7): 251–56.
Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. 2019. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16(3): 559.
Siboy, Ahmad. 2022. Pengantar Hukum Pilkada. ed. Rara Aisyah Rusdian. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sihaloho, Gunawan Laurensius. “Kebebasan Pembentuk Undang-Undang Dan Batasan Pengujian Undang-Undang Dalam Perspektif Open Legal Policy.” : 1–56.
Sundari Rizka Aditya, Lendy Siar, Maarthen Y.Tampanguma. 2024. “Pembentukan Hukum Progresif Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Privatum 13(4): 1–13. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/56773.
Tim Perludem. 2024. Catatan Awal Tahun 2024 Puncak Penyelenggaraan Pemilu : Konsolidasi Demokrasi Atau Kemunduran? Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salsa Octaviani S, Dedi Mulyadi, Ajeng Permana, Fina Asriani, M. Dika Salman Fikry, Zulfikar Nugraha Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
